Wednesday, November 12, 2008

Proposition 8: Be the Change

NaBloPoMo Day Twelve
Proposition 8: Be the Change


I'm hardly the first to recognize that the California initiative process is flawed. California permits constitutional amendment by a simple majority vote in a referendum. In the case of Proposition 8, it was a proposed constitutional amendment to take away the civil rights of a minority group, which civil rights expressly and properly belonged to that group according the California Supreme Court.

The requirement of obtaining signatures reflecting 8% of the voters to put a constitutional amendment into a ballot proposition (5% is all that is required for a law) is a relatively easy task these days. A well-funded group can readily harness the power of modern electronic communication (from emails to television ads), making the California constitution vulnerable to the tyranny of the majority – the very thing the Framers sought to protect individuals from when drafting the U.S. Constitution. In the case of Proposition 8, the simple majority of voters needed to pass it were lead by a group with an admitted religious agenda, a large amount of out-of-state funding, and a campaign fraught with untruths and scare tactics.

Proposition 8 would not be the first improper voter initiative to be struck down by the California Supreme Court. Meanwhile, is there anything standing in the way of an effort to sponsor another ballot initiative to again amend the California Constitution, this time to define marriage as between any two consenting adults? So then would a game of constitutional amendment ping pong begin, with the civil rights of an entire group of people serving as the ball in play.

The procedural problems with Proposition 8 will not be the only issue held up for legal scrutiny, and the matter will not be considered only locally. The substantive civil rights issues extant in denying same-sex partners the same rights to marriage that heterosexual partners have will be more closely examined in a national spotlight. Historically, we know that the major civil rights cases decided by the U.S. Supreme Court started with unconstitutional ballot initiatives, state laws, state courts, and/or state constitutions. Noted examples are Brown v. Board of Education (1954) (finding state segregation of schools, i.e., “separate but equal” to be unconstitutional) and Loving v. Virginia (1967) (finding state anti-miscegenation laws to be unconstitutional). Law Professor Jennifer E. Rothman opined over at The Huffington Post that Proposition 8 "may ultimately lead to a decision under the U.S. Constitution holding all marriage bans in all states unconstitutional. The federal constitution also protects privacy, liberty and equal protection and even conservative judges have not looked kindly on majority votes taking away rights." I believe that California will become the ground upon which equal protection for same-sex marriage partners will be built nationwide.

Meanwhile, just like racial segregation in schools and other public places was not a black issue, neither is taking away the right to marriage for same-sex partners an LGBTQ issue. Our constitution is supposed to protect everyone equally, and when it doesn’t, we the people have to stand up and do something about it. I received many emails and comments to my posts on this subject, and I have read many blog posts in support of civil rights for same-sex marriage partners. Many of you said that if you lived in California, you would have voted NO on Proposition 8. Well, now we all have the chance to say NO, to raise our voices against discrimination.

On Saturday, November 15, a national protest will be taking place simultaneously in all 50 states in the U.S. Some international locations are also participating. Please visit the website at Join the Impact and find out where to meet in your area and/or what you can do to participate in this historic event. This is a call to action. Whether or not you can or will be marching for civil rights on Saturday, you can still help. We can harness the power of electronics too, with emails, websites and blogs, Facebook, and Google or Yahoo groups. Spread the word.


National Protest Against Prop 8

Saturday, November 15, 2008
10:30AM West Coast
11:30AM Mountain
12:30PM Central
1:30PM East Coast


The ability of all loving adult partners to obtain a state marriage license in California may have been temporarily suspended, but the love we share can never be taken away. Rather, our love for each other, and the desire for equal protection for every last one of us, is now firmly planted in the fertile soil of California to spread across the nation. Share the message. Spread the word. Be the change that you want to see.

20 comments:

phd in yogurtry said...

Thank you SO much for posting this. I am emailing friends now, to see who wants to go.

Liz said...

AMEN. Well said.

I am trying to figure out the logistics so I can attend the rally in Indy on Saturday. And if I can't be there, I am spreading the word- through my blog, various message boards, Facebook, etc.

Gary Rith Pottery Blog said...

I just saw that Connecticut is starting gay marriage.
From what I have heard, the way CA does these props, shouldn't it be a state legislature thing? What are you paying those people for anyway?
In other news, I was somewhat surprised to discover prolix is a republican. That hurts. Just when I thought we was gonna be friends!

Janet said...

"Proposition 8 "may ultimately lead to a decision under the U.S. Constitution holding all marriage bans in all states unconstitutional." I HOPE this is the case!!!

Trish said...

AMEN! I will be spreading the word and I will be there if Frank brings Henry home on time that day!

thematically fickle said...

I'm spreading the word, too:
http://lastblogonearth.com/2008/11/12/get-it-together-california/

the cheap chick said...

YOU. ARE. AWESOME!!!!! Thank you for the heads up and letting us know what we can do to help.

Equal rights means, dur, EQUAL. And if you're going to give special legal and governmental treatment to married people, you MUST open marriage up to all consenting adults. Or do away with the tax breaks, etc. Sorry, folks. Equal means everyone, so get on board!

katydidnot said...

you made me cry. seriously. excellent post.

carrie said...

Thank you for this Cheri - you are right, we all CAN make a difference.

I feel a little bit better knowing I am not the only one feeling so frustrated. :)

Sojourner said...

Dearest Cheri- I feel honored to know such an intelligent, articulate, truly American lawyer, one who believes in the Constitution as it was meant to be carried out. Thanks for the info, thanks for your dedication to this cause. Thanks for being such a fine American citizen!

Jason, as himself said...

You. Are the best.

She said...

Thanks, Cheri!

Excellently written!

Amen.

Count me in.

San Diego Momma said...

Love when you talk about lawyerly and activisty.

I will spread the word.

Jenn @ Juggling Life said...

I have been wondering about the simple majority needed to pass a constitutional amendment myself. It seems ridiculous when you need a 2/3 majority for a tax increase.

I may not be there in person, but I will be there in spirit.

Nap Warden said...

Well said...I couldn't agree more!

Hey thanks for your commercial idea...it helped me to the idea I'm using. I will be shooting tom., editing Sat., hope to have it on the blog Sunday with an explanation:)

Stacey said...

Wow Cheri - so nicely written! Thank you for posting it & spreading the word!

Last Place Finisher said...

The California initiative process is flawed. It does seem too easy to amend the state's constitution. If the purpose of a constitution is to present a broad overview of governing principals, then the initiative process arguably undermines that purpose by allowing groups to fill the constitution with too many specifics - things that should be left to the legislature.

The process seems to have been abused in other ways. In real estate, "ballot box" legislation has been used by property owners to take advantage of the "small guys" (create favorable zoning for their projects that could be adverse to a community) and it has been used by the "small guys" to take advantage of property owners (prohibiting development in cases where development may make some sense).

The process isn't fair. Initiatives are drafted with the intention of being confusing. It is too easy to hide who is really behind an initiative. As a voter, it's hard to get the facts - initiatives are sold to the public on "spin."

I still can't say that the initiative process is a bad thing. Having this process allows the voting public some leverage over a corrupt legislature. I supppose that voters could always "vote out" bad representatives -- but in a practical sense, this doesn't seem to be a reliable alternative.

Do we need an initiative to fix initiatives?

Cheri @ Blog This Mom! said...

Last Place Finisher: You're funny. Heh. An initiative to fix initiative. Heh.

James Madison and Alexander Hamilton pointed out that pure democracy would produce a tyranny of the majority, and only representative government could both implement the people's will and filter out the passions and prejudices of majority factions.

It is obvious that the importance of direct democracy is sometimes at odds with the importance of a government intended to also represent individual interests.

The initiative process in California has been described by some constitutional scholars as being on the liberal side of the direct-democracy spectrum. While the scholarly debate about whether and how it might be overhauled is not a new subject, it should be an ongoing effort.

Meanwhile, the California Supreme Court should fulfill its purpose in our system of checks and balances. In this case, it must decide whether this particular proposition violates the state constitution, procedurally and substantively.

Eventually, the U.S. Supreme Court may (I would argue should) decide whether denying state licenses to same-sex marriage partners is a violation of the equal protection clause of the U.S. Constitution, among other things.

rockmomnoff said...

HI Cheri,

Thank you so much for writing! The world needs more like you. And I so appreciate my Straight sisters (and brothers) standing with us! We need you!!
Thanks, Laura (Tales of the Burbs Partner)

prolix said...

Your design junction I like very well. Thanks sharing these important information this post...Prolix Solutions